While the Philippines has made significant efforts to address multifaceted maritime governance issues, it continues to struggle to set clear strategic priorities amid complex challenges, according to a maritime security study initiated by several Australian educational institutions.
In an article that is part of the Blue Security project, it was pointed out that the government must set priority areas for international cooperation that should target a broad spectrum of strategic and environmental objectives related to coastal and marine management, tourism, transport, institutional capacities, and maritime and territorial disputes.
The study highlights that the situation faced by the Philippines often leads to a focus on immediate crises, resulting in the neglect of long-term sustainability and comprehensive governance.
One of the primary concerns identified in the report is the substantial maritime governance capacity gaps faced by the Philippines, particularly in terms of maritime domain awareness. The study emphasizes the need for improved surveillance capabilities, adequate assets such as patrol vessels and aircraft, and the development of information-sharing mechanisms to enhance the comprehensive and real-time understanding of the country’s extensive maritime zones.
These gaps hinder the effective execution of maritime operations, further exacerbated by budget constraints that impede the acquisition of necessary equipment and technology essential to meeting the country’s goal of ‘minimum credible deterrence’ and establishing a ‘self-reliant defense posture.’
To address these challenges, the study suggests that the Philippines should continue joint maritime exercises and patrols with partners and allies to counter threats such as piracy and incursions by foreign forces. Additionally, enhancing intelligence sharing and maritime surveillance will strengthen proactive defense and augment the capacity of the Philippine Coast Guard and Navy.
Regarding the South China Sea issue, the study emphasizes the importance of upholding the Philippines’ commitment to the 2016 Arbitral Award and enlisting support from the international community for its maritime rights. While leveraging relationships with long-standing ally, the United States, the study also recommends enhancing engagements with dialogue partners, including Australia, Canada, the European Union, India, Japan, and others.
Furthermore, the report suggests the establishment of more concrete mechanisms beyond diplomatic talks with China to ease tensions and ensure safe encounters at sea.
In conclusion, the maritime governance challenges faced by the Philippines require clear strategic priorities and international cooperation. By addressing capacity gaps, enhancing surveillance capabilities, and strengthening partnerships, the Philippines can work towards comprehensive governance and the protection of its maritime rights. It is crucial for the country to uphold the rule of law and engage with both allies and dialogue partners to ensure stability and safety in its maritime domain.
Source: The Manila Times
