BATAAN 1st District Rep. Geraldine Roman has expressed concerns about the proposed economic Charter change (Cha-cha) in the Philippines. She believes that if the proposed changes are only delivered by October, they will be “good as dead.” This is because the filing of certificates of candidacy for the 2025 midterm elections will start in October, diverting the attention of politicians away from the important issue at hand.
The proposed changes, known as Resolution of Both Houses (RBH) 6, are currently pending in the Senate. The Senate began its deliberations on RBH 6 last week. The resolution aims to add the words “unless otherwise provided by law” to certain provisions of the 1987 Constitution. This would require a separate House and Senate vote of three-fourths of the membership of each chamber.
RBH 6 was filed by Senate President Juan Miguel Zubiri, Sen. Loren Legarda, and Sen. Juan Edgardo “Sonny” Angara. The House has expressed its willingness to adopt the Senate version of economic Cha-cha.
Rep. Roman’s concerns highlight the challenges that the proposed economic Charter change faces. The timing of the delivery of the proposed changes is crucial. If they are not delivered before the filing of certificates of candidacy for the midterm elections, it is unlikely that the issue will receive the attention it deserves.
In the Philippines, the midterm elections are a significant event that captures the attention of politicians and the public. Candidates for various positions, including senators and congressmen, start filing their certificates of candidacy in October. This process marks the beginning of intense campaigning and political maneuvering.
During this period, it is understandable that politicians will prioritize their election campaigns over other matters, including the proposed economic Charter change. The focus shifts to garnering support, connecting with voters, and addressing the concerns of their constituents. As a result, the likelihood of meaningful discussions and deliberations on the proposed changes diminishes.
Rep. Roman’s statement reflects the sentiment shared by many politicians who are gearing up for the upcoming elections. They recognize the limited time available to address the complex issue of economic Charter change. If the proposed changes are not delivered and discussed before October, they risk being overshadowed by election-related activities.
The proposed economic Charter change has significant implications for the Philippines. It aims to modify certain provisions of the 1987 Constitution, potentially opening up opportunities for economic growth and development. However, its success depends on the commitment and focus of the lawmakers involved.
While the House has shown its willingness to adopt the Senate version of economic Cha-cha, the timing remains a critical factor. If the proposed changes are not given the attention they deserve before the midterm elections, they may struggle to gain traction and face significant challenges in their implementation.
In conclusion, the proposed economic Charter change in the Philippines faces obstacles, particularly in terms of timing. Rep. Roman’s concerns about the delivery of the proposed changes are valid, as the filing of certificates of candidacy for the midterm elections will divert the attention of politicians. It is crucial for the lawmakers involved to prioritize and address the issue before it becomes overshadowed by election-related activities. Only then can meaningful discussions and deliberations take place, leading to potential economic growth and development for the country.
Source: The Manila Times
