The Alleged Gentleman’s Agreement and the Call for Investigation
The alleged gentleman’s agreement between former President Rodrigo Duterte and the Chinese government has sparked significant interest and concern among members of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The purpose of the proposed investigation is to ensure transparency and protect the national interests of the Philippines.
The House of Representatives’ Commitment to Investigation
House Majority Leader Manuel Jose Dalipe has reiterated the commitment of the House of Representatives to conduct a comprehensive and fair investigation into this matter. The House has agreed to consider the call for a probe once regular sessions resume on April 29. The inquiry is expected to include testimonies from former government officials and diplomatic representatives, shedding light on the details and implications of the alleged agreement.
The Senate’s Interest in Holding a Hearing
Meanwhile, Senator Jinggoy Estrada, the chair of the Senate Committee on National Defense and Security, has expressed his willingness to hold a hearing on the same issue if it falls under his committee’s jurisdiction. This demonstrates the determination of both chambers of Congress to thoroughly examine the alleged agreement and its potential impact on the country’s sovereignty.
The Filing of Senate Resolution 982 and Controversy Surrounding the Agreement
The controversy surrounding this agreement gained momentum with the filing of Senate Resolution 982 by Senator Risa Hontiveros. The resolution was prompted by former Palace spokesperson Harry Roque’s statement that Duterte agreed to limit the resupply missions to the BRP Sierra Madre with only food and water. The BRP Sierra Madre, a World War II-era warship deliberately grounded on Ayungin Shoal, serves as a strategic outpost for the Philippines in the disputed waters.
Denials and Concerns from Key Figures
However, Salvador Panelo, the chief presidential legal counsel during the Duterte administration, has denied the existence of any agreement that would limit the maintenance of the BRP Sierra Madre. On the other hand, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., in a media interview in Washington, D.C., referred to the agreement as a “secret deal.” He expressed concerns that keeping such an agreement undisclosed could jeopardize Manila’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Questions Surrounding the Agreement and Implications for the Philippines
These concerns raised by Marcos have further fueled the debate surrounding the alleged agreement. Questions have been raised about the content of this secret agreement and the promises made by the Duterte administration to China. The confirmation of the Chinese embassy’s knowledge of the agreement has added weight to these concerns. While some refer to it as a gentleman’s agreement, Marcos considers it a secret agreement, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability.
The Importance of the Investigation
Ayungin Shoal, also known as Second Thomas Shoal, is a disputed territory claimed by China, Vietnam, and Taiwan. It lies well within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone, just 105 nautical miles from Palawan. The alleged agreement, if proven true, would have significant implications for the country’s territorial integrity and sovereign rights.
As this investigation unfolds, it is crucial for the government to uphold the principles of transparency and protect the national interests of the Philippines. The Constitution mandates that all treaties or international agreements must receive the concurrence of at least two-thirds of all members of the Senate to be valid and effective. This requirement underscores the importance of a thorough and impartial investigation into the alleged gentleman’s agreement, ensuring that the country’s sovereignty is safeguarded. In addition to ensuring transparency and protecting national interests, the probe also plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law. The alleged gentleman’s agreement, if proven to be true, raises questions about the legality and constitutionality of such an arrangement. It is essential for Congress to investigate whether the agreement violates any existing laws or international treaties that the Philippines is a party to.
The Role of Congress in Assessing Legal Implications
By conducting a thorough probe, Congress can assess the legal implications of the alleged agreement and determine whether any actions need to be taken to rectify the situation. This could involve reviewing existing legislation, proposing new laws, or engaging in diplomatic negotiations to address any potential violations of international law.
A Platform for Dialogue and Cooperation
Furthermore, the probe can serve as a platform for dialogue and cooperation among different branches of government. It provides an opportunity for lawmakers, legal experts, and government officials to come together and discuss the issue in a constructive manner. Through this collaborative approach, Congress can ensure that all perspectives are heard and that decisions are made in the best interest of the Filipino people.
Sending a Strong Message and Upholding International Norms
The probe also sends a strong message to other nations involved in the South China Sea dispute. It demonstrates the Philippines’ commitment to protecting its sovereignty and asserting its rights in the face of any potential challenges. By conducting a transparent and accountable investigation, the Philippines can show the international community that it will not tolerate any actions that undermine its territorial integrity.
Source: The Manila Times
