Support for Constitutional Amendments
In addition to his support for constitutional amendments, Sen. Robinhood Padilla also highlighted the importance of involving various stakeholders in the process. He stressed the need for a comprehensive approach that addresses both the economic and political aspects of the constitution. Padilla believes that tackling multiple provisions simultaneously will lead to a more holistic and effective reform.
Cost-effective Constitutional Convention
To ensure that the constitutional convention (con-con) is conducted in a cost-effective manner, Padilla intends to seek guidance from experienced individuals in the field. He mentioned that he plans to consult with former finance secretaries Margarito Teves and Romulo Neri, who have extensive knowledge and expertise in managing financial matters. Their insights will be valuable in devising strategies to minimize expenses and streamline the con-con process.
Resolution of Both Houses (RBH) 8
In line with his commitment to constitutional amendments, Sen. Padilla revealed his forthcoming action of filing Resolution of Both Houses (RBH) 8. This resolution, which represents the Senate’s version of charter change, will be submitted within the week. Currently, both the Senate’s RBH 8 and the House of Representatives’ RBH 7 are primarily focused on modifying the restrictive economic provisions of the 1987 constitution.
Comprehensive Review of the Constitution
However, Padilla recognizes that constitutional amendments should not be limited to economic provisions alone. He believes that a comprehensive review of the entire constitution is necessary to address the evolving needs and challenges of the country. By involving various stakeholders and taking a broader approach, Padilla aims to create a constitution that is responsive to the demands of the present and future generations.
Arguments for Extending Terms for Local Government Officials
Tolentino’s arguments for the extension of terms for local government officials resonated with many participants in the charter change hearing. They agreed that a longer term would provide officials with the necessary time to fully immerse themselves in the local challenges and forge stronger connections with the people they serve.
Opportunities for Leaving a Lasting Legacy
One of the main benefits of extending terms, as highlighted by Tolentino, is the opportunity for officials to leave a lasting legacy. With a longer term, officials can focus on implementing long-term strategic plans and development initiatives that can have a significant impact on their communities. They can dedicate more time to understanding the needs and aspirations of the people and work towards fulfilling them.
Enhancing Accountability and Efficiency
Moreover, longer terms can enhance accountability in governance. Officials will have more time to implement their plans and face the consequences of their actions. This can lead to a higher level of responsibility and transparency as officials are given the opportunity to see the full effects of their decisions and policies.
Another advantage of extending terms is the potential for greater competitiveness and efficiency in governance. With more time to carry out their initiatives, officials can work towards achieving their goals in a more comprehensive and effective manner. They can focus on implementing meaningful reforms and policies that can bring about real change at the grassroots level.
Arguments Against Extending Terms for Local Officials
However, not everyone agrees with the extension of terms for local officials. Critics argue that longer terms can lead to complacency and a lack of fresh perspectives in governance. They believe that shorter terms can promote a more dynamic and responsive government, as officials are constantly held accountable through regular elections.
Continuing Debate on Extension of Terms
The debate on the extension of terms for local officials continues to be a contentious topic in the discussion on charter change. As the arguments for and against are weighed, it is essential to consider the long-term implications of such a decision and ensure that it aligns with the best interests of the people and the overall development of the nation.
Source: The Manila Times
