In a recent development, China has filed a diplomatic protest with the Philippine embassies in Beijing and Manila over President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s congratulatory message to Taiwan’s new leader, Dr. Lai Ching-te. The China Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesman, Mao Ning, stated that Assistant Foreign Minister Nong Rong summoned the Philippine Ambassador to China, Jaime FlorCruz, to address the issue and demand a responsible response from the Philippines.
Mao Ning emphasized the importance of President Marcos Jr. gaining a proper understanding of the complexities surrounding the Taiwan question. He suggested that the President should delve deeper into the matter to arrive at a more informed conclusion. This diplomatic disagreement highlights the sensitivity of the Taiwan issue and China’s insistence on the “One China” principle.
The Chinese Embassy in Manila expressed its concern, stating that President Marcos Jr. was the only head of state among 182 countries with diplomatic relations with China to congratulate Lai. The embassy condemned Marcos’ remarks, claiming that they violated the “One China” principle and constituted a gross interference in China’s internal affairs.
According to the embassy, there is a universally recognized consensus that there is only one China, and Taiwan is an integral part of China’s territory. The government of the People’s Republic of China is recognized as the sole legal government representing the entire country. The “One China” principle serves as the political premise for China’s diplomatic relations with 182 countries, including the Philippines.
The embassy reminded the Philippines of its commitment to the “One China” policy, which was established in a joint communique signed by President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. and Premier Zhou Enlai on June 9, 1975. They emphasized that subsequent Philippine administrations have adhered to this policy.
In response to the recent elections in Taiwan, the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs reaffirmed the country’s commitment to the “One China” policy. However, the embassy expressed concern that President Marcos Jr.’s remarks contradicted the Philippine government’s statement, sending erroneous signals to “Taiwan independence” separatist forces.
The embassy urged the Philippine side to earnestly abide by the “One China” principle and to refrain from making statements or taking actions that go against it. They emphasized the need for the Philippines to handle Taiwan-related issues prudently and properly.
This diplomatic dispute highlights the delicate nature of international relations and the complexities surrounding the Taiwan question. It serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting each country’s sovereignty and adhering to established diplomatic norms. As this issue unfolds, it will be interesting to see how both China and the Philippines navigate this diplomatic challenge and work towards a resolution that upholds their respective interests.
Source: The Manila Times
