The revival of the drug war by Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte has sparked outrage among leading critics who have long been vocal about the human rights violations and extrajudicial killings associated with the controversial campaign. These critics argue that the decision to revive the brutal policy not only perpetuates a culture of violence and impunity, but also undermines efforts to address the root causes of drug addiction and promote rehabilitation and social reintegration.
Former President Rodrigo Duterte’s war on drugs, which was launched in 2016, drew widespread international condemnation for its heavy-handed approach and disregard for due process. Human rights organizations and activists have documented numerous cases of extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, and torture in the name of the drug war.
The recent killings of seven drug suspects in separate police operations in Davao City have only intensified the criticism against Mayor Duterte’s decision. The “leave or die” warning issued by the younger Duterte to drug dealers and users has raised concerns about the potential for further violence and abuse of power.
Leading critics argue that a punitive approach to drug addiction is ineffective and counterproductive. They emphasize the need for a comprehensive and evidence-based approach that prioritizes prevention, treatment, and harm reduction strategies. These critics believe that the revival of the drug war not only fails to address the underlying socio-economic factors that contribute to drug abuse, but also exacerbates the stigmatization and marginalization of individuals struggling with addiction.
Moreover, critics argue that the drug war disproportionately targets marginalized communities and perpetuates systemic inequalities. They point to the fact that the majority of those killed or incarcerated in the drug war are from low-income backgrounds, while the high-level drug traffickers and kingpins often evade justice.
As the debate over the revival of the drug war continues, critics are calling for a shift towards a more compassionate and rights-based approach to drug policy. They advocate for increased investment in healthcare, education, and social support systems to address the root causes of drug addiction, rather than relying solely on punitive measures.
The decision of Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte to revive the drug war has reignited the contentious discussion surrounding the effectiveness and ethics of the campaign. It remains to be seen whether the younger Duterte will heed the concerns of his critics and reconsider his approach, or if the revival of the drug war will only further deepen the divisions within Philippine society.
Colmenares’s concerns about the dangerous environment created by the drug war are not unfounded. The revival of the drug war has indeed led to an increase in killings and human rights violations. The death squads, known for their brutal methods, continue to operate with impunity, instilling fear among the people.
It is disheartening to see local officials using the drug war as a means to gain popularity. Instead of focusing on implementing effective strategies to address the drug problem, they engage in gimmickry and empty rhetoric. This not only undermines the seriousness of the issue but also shows a lack of commitment to finding sustainable solutions.
Colmenares’s criticism of the former president’s drug war efforts is valid. Despite the aggressive approach taken by Duterte during his presidency, the drug problem in the country remains unresolved. The “war on drugs” has failed to address the root causes of drug addiction and has instead resulted in a cycle of violence and impunity.
The call for accountability is crucial in ensuring justice for the victims of extrajudicial killings and human rights violations. Colmenares rightly suggests that those responsible for these atrocities should be held accountable. The international criminal court has a role to play in this process, as it can help bring justice to the victims and serve as a deterrent for officials who continue to engage in brutal practices.
The need to break the cycle of violence and create a safer environment for the people cannot be overstated. It is imperative for the government to shift its focus from a punitive approach to a comprehensive strategy that includes prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation. Only by addressing the root causes of drug addiction and providing support to those affected can a lasting solution be achieved.
In order to implement a comprehensive and rights-based approach to addressing drug-related issues, it is essential to recognize the complex nature of the problem. The drug trade is not limited to the activities of drug syndicates alone; it involves a wide range of interconnected factors that contribute to its perpetuation.
One of the key components of a comprehensive approach is the dismantling of drug syndicates. This requires a multi-faceted strategy that involves intelligence gathering, targeted law enforcement operations, and collaboration with international partners to disrupt the drug supply chains. By dismantling these syndicates, we can significantly reduce the availability of drugs in the market and weaken the influence of those who profit from this illicit trade.
However, addressing the supply side of the drug problem is only one aspect of the equation. It is equally important to focus on demand reduction and prevention efforts. This involves implementing evidence-based drug prevention programs in schools and communities, providing access to treatment and rehabilitation services for individuals struggling with substance abuse, and promoting alternative livelihood opportunities for vulnerable populations.
Furthermore, Colmenares’s call for the arrest of government officials who serve as “drug syndicate protectors” highlights the need for accountability and transparency in the fight against drugs. Corruption within law enforcement agencies and government institutions undermines the effectiveness of drug control efforts and erodes public trust. By holding these officials accountable, we can send a strong message that no one is above the law and that the fight against drugs should be conducted with integrity and fairness.
While dismantling drug syndicates, reducing demand, and ensuring accountability are important steps towards a comprehensive approach, it is crucial to emphasize the rights-based aspect of drug policy. This means placing human rights at the center of all drug-related interventions, ensuring that individuals affected by drug use are treated with dignity and respect, and protecting their right to health, privacy, and due process.
A rights-based approach also entails addressing the underlying social, economic, and structural factors that contribute to drug use and the illicit drug trade. This includes addressing poverty, inequality, and social exclusion, as well as promoting access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities. By addressing these root causes, we can create an environment that is less conducive to drug use and reduce the vulnerability of individuals to becoming involved in the drug trade.
In conclusion, a comprehensive and rights-based approach to addressing drug-related issues requires a multi-faceted strategy that encompasses dismantling drug syndicates, reducing demand, ensuring accountability, and addressing the underlying social and economic factors. By adopting such an approach, we can work towards a society that is free from the harms associated with drug use and drug trafficking, while upholding the fundamental rights and dignity of all individuals.
Deep concern over the revival of the drug war is shared not only by Human Rights Watch but also by various other human rights organizations and activists. The declaration made by Mayor Baste Duterte has raised alarms about the potential consequences it may have on the already dire human rights situation in the city. The previous administration’s anti-drug policies, which were characterized by extrajudicial killings and rampant human rights abuses, have left a lasting impact on the lives of countless individuals and families.
As the drug war is revived, there is a genuine fear that history will repeat itself, and innocent lives will be lost in the process. Human Rights Watch, along with other organizations, is calling on the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to take immediate action and rescind the previous administration’s policies. It is crucial for the government to prioritize the protection of human rights and ensure that law enforcement agencies operate within the bounds of the law.
The organization further emphasizes the need for the police to “stand down” and refrain from engaging in extrajudicial killings and other forms of human rights violations. This call is not only rooted in the principles of justice and accountability but also in the understanding that a sustainable solution to the drug problem cannot be achieved through violence and disregard for human rights.
Instead, Human Rights Watch proposes a comprehensive approach that focuses on addressing the root causes of drug addiction and implementing evidence-based harm reduction strategies. This includes investing in drug rehabilitation programs, improving access to healthcare and social services, and promoting education and awareness about the dangers of drug abuse.
Furthermore, it is imperative for the government to engage in dialogue with civil society organizations, human rights defenders, and affected communities to develop a holistic and inclusive drug policy. By involving all stakeholders in the decision-making process, the government can ensure that the policies implemented are effective, fair, and respectful of human rights.
The revival of the drug war should not be seen as a quick fix to a complex issue. It requires a nuanced and compassionate approach that prioritizes the well-being and dignity of all individuals. Human Rights Watch, along with its partners, stands ready to support the government in its efforts to address the drug problem while upholding human rights and the rule of law.
A War Against the Poor
Renee Louise Co, the executive vice president of Kabataan Party-list, criticized the current drug war as a “war against poor individuals in Davao and nationwide,” highlighting the failure to penalize the large drug lords or address the economic crisis that has pushed many youths to resort to illegal drugs.
The concerns raised by these leading critics reflect the growing opposition to the revival of the drug war and the need for a more comprehensive and rights-based approach to address the complex issue of drug abuse and trafficking. It is crucial for the government to consider these perspectives and explore alternative strategies that prioritize the protection of human rights and the well-being of all citizens.
Co’s statement resonates with the experiences of countless marginalized individuals who have been disproportionately affected by the drug war. The war on drugs, as it stands, has primarily targeted low-income communities, leaving the root causes of drug addiction unaddressed. Rather than focusing solely on punitive measures, it is essential to adopt a more holistic approach that tackles the underlying issues driving drug abuse.
One of the key factors contributing to the prevalence of drug addiction among the poor is the lack of educational and economic opportunities. Many individuals living in poverty find themselves trapped in a cycle of hopelessness and despair, with limited access to quality education and stable employment. Without viable alternatives, they often turn to drugs as a means of escape or as a way to cope with their challenging circumstances.
In order to effectively combat drug abuse, it is crucial to address the systemic inequalities that perpetuate poverty and limit opportunities for social mobility. This requires investing in education and vocational training programs that empower individuals with the skills and knowledge needed to secure stable employment. Additionally, providing support for small-scale entrepreneurs and promoting inclusive economic policies can help alleviate the economic hardships faced by marginalized communities.
Furthermore, it is essential to prioritize healthcare and rehabilitation services for individuals struggling with drug addiction. Rather than stigmatizing and criminalizing drug users, a rights-based approach would emphasize access to quality healthcare and evidence-based treatment programs. This would involve increasing funding for addiction treatment centers, expanding harm reduction initiatives, and destigmatizing addiction through public education campaigns.
Ultimately, the fight against drug abuse should not be waged solely through punitive measures that disproportionately impact the poor. It requires a multifaceted approach that addresses the root causes of addiction, promotes social and economic justice, and prioritizes the well-being and human rights of all individuals. By shifting the focus from punishment to prevention and rehabilitation, society can create a more just and compassionate response to the complex issue of drug abuse.
Source: The Manila Times
