The House Committee on Ethics and Privileges Gives Rep. Pantaleon Alvarez 10 Days to Respond to Complaint
The House Committee on Ethics and Privileges has recently issued a notice to Davao del Norte 1st District Representative, Pantaleon Alvarez, giving him a period of 10 days to address a complaint filed against him. This development comes after the committee considered a complaint filed by Tagum Mayor Rey Uy and several others, as stated by Ako Bicol Representative Raul Angelo Bongalon, a member of the committee.
The Nature of the Complaint
According to Bongalon, the complaint against Alvarez revolves around various allegations. Firstly, it includes his statement made during a rally in April. Additionally, it highlights his habitual absences in Congress and accuses him of making allegedly libelous remarks. The committee has found the complaint filed by Rey Uy to be sufficient in both form and content, leading to their decision to send a notice to Alvarez’s office.
Notice Sent to Alvarez’s Office
To ensure that Alvarez has ample time to respond to the allegations, the House Committee on Ethics and Privileges has sent a notice to his office. This notice was delivered via registered mail and also through electronic means, specifically to Alvarez’s registered and official email address, as well as his chief of staff. The committee expects Alvarez to provide his response within 10 days from the receipt of the notice.
Alvarez’s Controversial Statement and Subsequent Denial
One of the key aspects of the complaint against Alvarez is his statement made during a rally in Tagum City. During the rally, Alvarez allegedly urged the military to peacefully withdraw its support for President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., with the aim of forcing his resignation and preventing further tension between the Philippines and China in the West Philippine Sea.
However, the military rejected Alvarez’s call, expressing their commitment to upholding their duty and remaining loyal to the government. Following the backlash from his colleagues in the House of Representatives, Alvarez denied that his statement was seditious. He defended himself by stating that his passion for the country was the driving force behind his words and that he believed the government’s actions were leading the nation towards war.
Alvarez further argued that his statement was protected by the freedom of speech clause in the constitution and should not be considered seditious or disorderly conduct under the Revised Penal Code or House rules.
In light of these developments, the House Committee on Ethics and Privileges has taken action to address the complaint against Alvarez. By providing him with an opportunity to respond, the committee aims to ensure a fair and thorough examination of the allegations made against the representative.
It is important to note that the outcome of this process will depend on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties involved. The House Committee on Ethics and Privileges will carefully evaluate the response provided by Alvarez before making any further decisions or recommendations.
As the situation unfolds, it is crucial for the public to stay informed and maintain a balanced perspective. Transparency and accountability are essential in upholding the integrity of the legislative process and ensuring that the actions of elected officials are in line with the principles of good governance.
Source: The Manila Times