SONSHINE Media Network International (SMNI) has requested the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) to provide specific details regarding the alleged violations of franchise terms that have resulted in the network’s 30-day suspension. The network’s legal counsels, Mark Tolentino and Rolex Suplico, filed a motion for a bill of particulars before the NTC on Thursday.
In their motion, the SMNI lawyers emphasized that the network cannot adequately respond to the charges without being fully informed of the allegations against them. By seeking clarity on the violations, SMNI aims to ensure a fair and informed legal process.
The NTC issued the 30-day suspension order against SMNI on December 21, 2023, based on allegations of franchise term violations. These allegations stemmed from House Resolution 1499, which specifically cites Section 4 of SMNI’s franchise. This section prohibits the network from using its facilities to disseminate false information.
The suspension order was prompted by statements made by SMNI hosts, Lorraine Badoy and Jeffrey Celiz, accusing Speaker Martin Romualdez of spending P1.8 billion on foreign travel between January and October of that year. These allegations raised concerns about the network’s adherence to its franchise terms.
In addition to the suspension order, SMNI has also been issued a show cause notice, requiring them to explain why they should not face administrative sanctions. This further underscores the seriousness of the allegations and the need for SMNI to address them appropriately.
To challenge the suspension order, SMNI filed a petition for certiorari and mandamus with an application for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction before the Court of Appeals (CA) on December 28, 2023. The network sought to halt the implementation of the suspension order through legal means.
However, on January 4, the CA dismissed SMNI’s petition, citing the network’s failure to comply with the requirement of filing a motion for reconsideration before submitting a petition for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus. This setback highlights the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in legal proceedings.
The developments surrounding SMNI’s suspension have raised questions about the network’s compliance with its franchise terms and the potential impact on its operations. As the legal process unfolds, SMNI will have the opportunity to address the allegations and present its case before the appropriate authorities.
It is crucial for both SMNI and the NTC to ensure a fair and transparent process that upholds the principles of justice. The provision of specific details regarding the alleged violations will enable SMNI to respond effectively and contribute to a thorough examination of the situation.
As the case progresses, it will be important to closely monitor the legal proceedings and any subsequent decisions that may impact SMNI’s operations. The outcome of this case will not only have implications for the network but also serve as a precedent for other media organizations operating within the regulatory framework.
In conclusion, SMNI’s request for clarity on the alleged violations leading to its suspension demonstrates the network’s commitment to a fair and informed legal process. As the case unfolds, it is essential for all parties involved to uphold the principles of justice and ensure a transparent examination of the allegations.
Source: The Manila Times
