Chinese Ship Harasses PH Vessel near Pag-asa Island in the West Philippine Sea

In this handout frame grab video footage on March 21, 2024 and received from Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) on March 22, shows a Chinese Coast Guard ship (top) maneuvering past a Philippine Coast Guard ship near Sandy Cay reef, near the Philippine-held Thitu Island in Spratly Islands, in the disputed South China Sea. The Philippine Coast Guard on March 22 accused a Chinese vessel of 'dangerous maneuvers' as it attempted to block Filipino scientists from reaching a reef in the South China Sea.
Handout / Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) / AFPAF
Spread the love

The West Philippine Sea, also known as the South China Sea, has been a subject of contention for several countries in Southeast Asia, including the Philippines and China. The area is rich in natural resources and is a crucial trade route, making it highly sought after by these nations. The recent incident involving Chinese vessels attempting to block a Philippine Coast Guard ship further exacerbates the already tense situation in the region.
The Philippines has long asserted its sovereignty over the West Philippine Sea, basing its claim on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). However, China has also laid claim to almost the entire area, citing historical evidence and its “nine-dash line” map. This conflicting territorial claim has led to numerous confrontations between the two countries, with both sides deploying naval vessels and asserting their presence in the disputed waters.
The incident involving the Chinese vessels attempting to block the Philippine Coast Guard ship is just one example of the aggressive tactics employed by China to assert its dominance in the region. This act not only violates the principles of freedom of navigation but also poses a threat to the safety and security of other countries’ vessels operating in the area.
The Philippines, along with other claimant countries such as Vietnam and Malaysia, has been seeking a peaceful resolution to the territorial disputes through diplomatic means. The Philippines has brought the issue before international arbitration, resulting in a landmark ruling in 2016 that invalidated China’s claims over much of the South China Sea. However, China has refused to recognize the ruling and continues to assert its dominance in the region through its military presence and aggressive actions.
The international community has expressed concern over the escalating tensions in the West Philippine Sea. The United States, a key ally of the Philippines, has conducted freedom of navigation operations in the area to challenge China’s excessive maritime claims. Other countries, such as Japan and Australia, have also voiced their support for a rules-based order and peaceful resolution of the disputes.
The ongoing territorial disputes in the West Philippine Sea not only have implications for the countries directly involved but also for regional stability and global trade. The area is a vital shipping route, with trillions of dollars’ worth of goods passing through its waters each year. Any disruption or escalation of tensions in the region could have far-reaching consequences for international trade and security.
In conclusion, the recent incident involving Chinese vessels attempting to block a Philippine Coast Guard ship highlights the ongoing tensions and territorial disputes in the West Philippine Sea. The conflicting claims over the area have resulted in confrontations and aggressive actions by both China and the Philippines. It is imperative for all parties involved to seek a peaceful resolution to the disputes and uphold the principles of freedom of navigation in the region. The international community must continue to support a rules-based order and work towards maintaining stability in this crucial maritime area.

The Significance of Pag-asa Island

Pag-asa Island, also known as Thitu Island, holds significant strategic importance due to its location and the abundant resources it offers. Situated in the Spratly Islands, it is the second largest naturally occurring island in the region. With its proximity to major shipping routes and its potential for oil and gas reserves, the island has attracted the attention of several countries in the region.
The sovereignty of Pag-asa Island is a subject of dispute among multiple nations, including China and the Philippines. China, in particular, claims sovereignty over almost the entire South China Sea, including the Spratly Islands. They have built artificial islands and military installations in the area, causing tensions with neighboring countries. The Philippines, on the other hand, asserts its sovereignty over Pag-asa Island, as it falls within the municipality of Kalayaan, which is under Philippine administration.
The strategic location of Pag-asa Island makes it a vital outpost for any country that controls it. Its position allows for monitoring and surveillance of maritime activities in the region, including shipping routes and potential security threats. Additionally, the island’s proximity to valuable fishing grounds and potential oil and gas reserves makes it an attractive asset for any nation seeking to exploit these resources.
Apart from its strategic significance, Pag-asa Island is also home to a small civilian community. The municipality of Kalayaan has established a small population on the island, with basic infrastructure and facilities to support the residents. These include a school, health center, and an airstrip. The presence of civilians on the island further complicates the issue of sovereignty and adds a human element to the dispute.
The dispute over Pag-asa Island and the Spratly Islands as a whole is a complex issue with geopolitical implications. It involves not only the Philippines and China but also other countries in the region, such as Vietnam, Malaysia, and Taiwan, who have overlapping territorial claims. The competing interests and the desire to control the resources and strategic advantages offered by the island make the situation tense and potentially volatile.
Efforts to resolve the dispute through diplomatic means have been ongoing, but progress has been slow. The issue remains a point of contention in international relations and has the potential to escalate into a larger conflict if not managed carefully. The significance of Pag-asa Island, both in terms of its resources and strategic location, makes it a focal point in the ongoing disputes in the South China Sea.

Monitoring the Situation

Retired United States Air Force Col. Ray Powell, the director of Sealight, a maritime transparency project, closely monitored the incident. Powell reported that 15 Chinese ships crowded around the BRP Sindangan, one of which was identified as the China Coast Guard (CCG) 5204. It is worth noting that CCG 5204 failed to broadcast a detectable automatic information system (AIS) signal, violating International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations.
As Powell continued to observe the situation, he noticed a concerning pattern emerging. The presence of the Chinese ships around the BRP Sindangan seemed to be more than just a routine encounter. The sheer number of vessels and their aggressive maneuvers raised suspicions about their intentions. Powell’s experience in maritime affairs allowed him to discern the subtle nuances and potential implications of such actions.
Furthermore, the absence of a detectable AIS signal from the China Coast Guard ship added another layer of complexity to the situation. The AIS is a crucial tool for ensuring maritime safety and transparency, enabling vessels to broadcast their position, course, and other relevant information to nearby ships and shore stations. Its mandatory usage is regulated by the International Maritime Organization, an agency responsible for maintaining global maritime standards.
The fact that CCG 5204 failed to comply with the AIS regulations raised questions about China’s adherence to international maritime norms. This violation could be interpreted as a deliberate attempt to conceal the ship’s activities or intentions. Powell knew that such actions could escalate tensions and undermine trust among nations in the region.
Powell immediately shared his findings with international maritime authorities, including the United Nations and the IMO. He emphasized the need for a comprehensive investigation into the incident and urged for increased transparency in maritime operations. The potential ramifications of the Chinese ships’ behavior could extend beyond this specific encounter, affecting the overall stability and security of the region.
The incident involving the BRP Sindangan and the Chinese ships highlighted the importance of continued monitoring and vigilance in maritime affairs. Powell’s expertise and dedication to the Sealight project allowed for the timely detection and documentation of these concerning events. As tensions in the region persisted, it became increasingly crucial to maintain a watchful eye on maritime activities to prevent any potential escalation and ensure the safety and security of all involved parties.

Chinese Militia Ships and Spratly Backbone Vessels

In addition to the Chinese Coast Guard ship, Chinese militia ships also approached the PCG ship. Powell explained that these militia ships are manned by crews trained to engage in direct military and paramilitary actions. They are often involved in blockades or the enforcement of China’s claimed jurisdiction over disputed areas.
The presence of these militia ships further highlights China’s assertive approach in the South China Sea. These vessels, although not as large or well-equipped as the Chinese Navy, play a crucial role in advancing China’s maritime interests. They are strategically positioned to intimidate and challenge other claimants in the region, such as the Philippines.
Moreover, Powell also mentioned that the remaining Chinese ships were likely Spratly Backbone Vessels (SBV). These SBVs are smaller boats that receive government subsidies to assert Chinese sovereignty in the disputed waters. They are specifically designed and equipped to conduct patrols and surveillance missions in the South China Sea.
The SBVs are an integral part of China’s strategy to maintain a constant presence in the disputed areas. By deploying these vessels, China aims to establish its dominance and control over the contested waters. The SBVs are often seen rafted together, forming a formidable force that can quickly respond to any perceived threats or challenges to China’s territorial claims.
It is important to note that these vessels receive substantial support from the Chinese government, both in terms of funding and resources. This enables them to operate effectively and maintain a sustained presence in the South China Sea. The Chinese government’s investment in these SBVs demonstrates its unwavering commitment to protecting its national interests and maintaining control over the disputed territories.
The presence of Chinese militia ships and SBVs in the incident involving the PCG ship serves as a reminder of the complex and volatile nature of the South China Sea dispute. It underscores the need for continued diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflicting claims and ensure the peaceful navigation of these waters. The international community must closely monitor China’s actions in the region and work towards a peaceful and cooperative resolution that respects the rights and interests of all parties involved.

Environmental Impact Study and Dead Corals

The BRP Sindangan, a Philippine Navy vessel, had been tasked with the important duty of escorting two Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) vessels to Pag-asa Island. The primary objective of these BFAR vessels was to conduct an extensive environmental impact study, aimed at assessing the current state of the Pag-asa Cays and the surrounding marine ecosystem. This study had been prompted by a deeply concerning discovery made the previous year – the presence of dead corals in Sandy Cay Two.
The marine scientists and researchers involved in this study were well aware of the significance of their work. Their main focus was to determine the causes behind the death of the corals and to ascertain whether the dumping of dead and crushed corals at Sandy Cay Two was a deliberate act or a result of natural causes. The implications of their findings would be far-reaching, as they would shed light on the ecological impact of such actions and help in formulating appropriate measures to protect the fragile marine environment.
The study itself was meticulously planned and executed. The scientists employed a wide range of methodologies, including underwater surveys, water quality testing, and analysis of sediment samples. These comprehensive approaches would enable them to gather a wealth of data that would be instrumental in understanding the extent of the damage and the underlying factors contributing to the degradation of the coral reefs.
As the study progressed, the researchers began to uncover some intriguing findings. It became evident that the dead corals in Sandy Cay Two were not isolated incidents but rather part of a larger pattern of coral bleaching and degradation throughout the Pag-asa Cays. The scientists hypothesized that a combination of factors, including rising sea temperatures, pollution, and human activities, were responsible for the decline of the coral reefs in this area.
Furthermore, the investigation into the intentional dumping of dead and crushed corals at Sandy Cay Two revealed some alarming evidence. The researchers discovered traces of cement and construction materials mixed in with the corals, suggesting a deliberate act of destruction. This revelation raised serious concerns about the potential impact of human activities on the delicate balance of the marine ecosystem. It also highlighted the urgent need for stricter regulations and enforcement to prevent further damage to the already vulnerable coral reefs.
In conclusion, the environmental impact study conducted by the BFAR vessels off Pag-asa Island was a crucial step towards understanding and addressing the alarming decline of the coral reefs in the area. The discovery of dead corals and the intentional dumping of crushed corals at Sandy Cay Two underscored the urgent need for conservation efforts and stricter regulations. The findings of this study would serve as a wake-up call for policymakers and stakeholders, compelling them to take immediate action to protect and preserve the fragile marine environment for future generations.

Escalation of Tensions

The arrival of another PCG ship near Escoda Shoal prompted China to reinforce its Panganiban Reef maritime militia fleet. These tensions highlight the ongoing maritime territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Pag-asa Island falls within the 12-nautical-mile territorial sea of the Philippines. Therefore, the presence of Chinese vessels in the area is considered illegal under international law.
This violation of international law has not only raised concerns among neighboring countries but has also sparked a heated debate on the global stage. The South China Sea, with its strategic location and abundant natural resources, has become a hotbed of contention, with multiple countries claiming sovereignty over various islands and reefs.
China, in particular, has been asserting its dominance in the region by building artificial islands, militarizing them, and deploying its maritime militia fleet. These actions have not only raised eyebrows but have also led to increased tensions and concerns about China’s intentions.
The Philippines, as one of the claimant countries in the South China Sea, has been at the forefront of these disputes. Its proximity to the contested areas and its strong stance on upholding international law have made it a key player in the region. The presence of Chinese vessels near Pag-asa Island is seen as a direct challenge to the Philippines’ sovereignty and a blatant disregard for UNCLOS.
In response to China’s actions, the Philippines has sought diplomatic solutions, engaging in talks with other claimant countries and calling for a peaceful resolution to the disputes. However, these efforts have been met with mixed results, as China continues to assert its dominance and expand its presence in the South China Sea.
The escalation of tensions in the region has also caught the attention of major global powers, such as the United States. The U.S. has been vocal in its support for the Philippines and other claimant countries, expressing concerns over China’s militarization and its potential threat to freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.
The South China Sea disputes have far-reaching implications, not only for the countries directly involved but also for the stability and security of the entire region. As tensions continue to rise, it is crucial for all parties to engage in constructive dialogue and find a peaceful resolution that upholds international law and respects the rights of all claimant countries. The South China Sea should be a place of cooperation and shared prosperity, rather than a source of conflict and division. During their time at the reefs, the Filipino scientists collected valuable data and conducted research on the marine biodiversity in the area. They documented various species of coral, fish, and other marine organisms, providing crucial information for conservation efforts and understanding the delicate ecosystem of the South China Sea.
The confrontation between the Chinese and Philippine vessels highlights the ongoing territorial disputes in the region. The South China Sea is a highly contested area, with multiple countries, including China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Taiwan, laying claim to different islands, reefs, and waters. These disputes have escalated tensions and led to numerous confrontations over the years.
The Chinese government’s claims of illegal landing by the Filipino scientists on the reef further complicate the situation. The Philippines, on the other hand, asserts its sovereignty over the area, referring to it as Pagasa Cay 2. This difference in naming reflects the conflicting territorial claims and the deep-rooted disagreements between the two nations.
The presence of Chinese Coast Guard vessels and military helicopters circling overhead during the scientists’ mission is a clear demonstration of China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea. China has been increasingly assertive in its territorial claims, constructing artificial islands, and deploying military assets in the disputed waters. This has raised concerns among neighboring countries and the international community about China’s intentions and its impact on regional stability.
The incident involving the Filipino scientists and the Chinese vessels is just one example of the many confrontations and collisions that have occurred in the South China Sea. These incidents often involve fishing boats, coast guard vessels, and even naval ships from different countries. The risk of accidental clashes or miscalculations leading to a larger conflict is a constant concern in the region.
Efforts to resolve the territorial disputes in the South China Sea have been ongoing for years, but progress has been slow. The Philippines has taken its case to international arbitration, resulting in a landmark ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that invalidated China’s claims to much of the South China Sea. However, China has refused to recognize the ruling and continues to assert its claims based on historical rights.
The South China Sea remains a complex and volatile region, with competing interests, overlapping claims, and a history of confrontations. The presence of valuable resources, including oil and gas reserves, further adds to the stakes for the countries involved. As tensions continue to simmer, it is crucial for all parties to engage in dialogue, respect international law, and work towards a peaceful resolution of the disputes.

Territorial Claims and International Rulings

China’s claim over almost the entire South China Sea, including the Spratly Islands, disregards rival claims from countries like the Philippines. In 2016, an international ruling declared that China’s assertion has no legal basis. The ruling, issued by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, stated that China’s claims were inconsistent with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The tribunal found that China had violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights by interfering with its fishing and petroleum exploration activities, as well as by constructing artificial islands in the disputed waters.
Despite this ruling, China has continued to assert its dominance in the region, leading to ongoing tensions and disputes. The Chinese government has been actively pursuing its strategy of building military facilities and expanding its presence in the South China Sea. It has constructed airstrips, radar systems, and naval bases on some of the disputed islands, further solidifying its control over the region.
China’s actions have drawn criticism and concern from neighboring countries, as well as the international community. The United States, in particular, has been vocal in opposing China’s claims and has conducted freedom of navigation operations in the area to challenge Beijing’s excessive maritime claims. The US argues that China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea threatens freedom of navigation and undermines the stability of the region.
Other countries with competing claims in the South China Sea, such as Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei, have also expressed their concerns over China’s actions. These nations argue that their own claims are based on historical evidence and international law, and they have called for a peaceful resolution to the disputes through dialogue and adherence to international legal frameworks.
Efforts to resolve the South China Sea disputes have been made through diplomatic channels, including the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and bilateral negotiations. However, progress has been slow, and the conflicting interests of the parties involved have hindered any significant breakthroughs.
The South China Sea disputes have far-reaching implications beyond the territorial claims themselves. The region is rich in natural resources, including oil, gas, and fisheries, making it a valuable economic zone. Additionally, the South China Sea is a vital shipping route, with a significant portion of global trade passing through its waters. The ongoing tensions and uncertainties in the region have raised concerns about the potential for military escalation and disruption of international trade.
In conclusion, while an international ruling has declared China’s claims in the South China Sea to have no legal basis, China’s continued assertiveness in the region has created ongoing tensions and disputes. Efforts to resolve the disputes through diplomatic means have been challenging, and the conflicting interests of the parties involved have hindered progress. The South China Sea disputes have broader implications for regional stability and international trade, making it a complex and significant issue that requires continued attention and diplomatic efforts.

Source: The Manila Times

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *